|
Abstract.
The article explores a method for quantitative research of the effectiveness of information infrastructure, systems, and process activities using the Event-driven Process Methodology (EdPM) notation and the results of simulation modeling for structural-functional models. To assess effectiveness, statistical data obtained from simulation modeling and graph analysis methods are used. A modified version of the PageRank algorithm is presented, enabling the ranking of nodes based on the number of accesses and analyzing loading times depending on the calculation step. A sequence of steps is proposed to obtain quantitative efficiency estimates, thereby allowing for the comparison of structural-functional models while considering the conditions in which they operate. The article includes an example of deriving efficiency estimates for a structural-functional model of a multi-production project management process.
Keywords:
Event-driven Process Methodology, EdPM, Structure-Function Modeling, Simulation, PageRank, Performance of the structural-functional model.
DOI 10.14357/20718632250309
EDN PTFNJX
PP. 98-112.
References
1. Solow R.M. We’d Better Watch Out. New York Times Buisness Review. 1987. 36. 2. Grisold T. and al. “BPM is Dead, Long Live BPM!” – An Interview with Tom Davenport. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2024; 66(5): 639–642. 3. van der Aalst W. Process Mining. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2016. 467 р. 4. Dori D. Object-Process Methodology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2002. 5. Sovetov, B. Ya., Yakovlev S. A. Simulation systems. M.: High School; 2001. 343 р (In Russ). 6. Murata T. Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1989; 77(4): 541–580. 7. Taha, H. A. Operations research an introduction. M.: Wiliams; 2007. 901 р (In Russ). 8. Cormen Th., Leiserson Ch., Rivest R., Stein C. Introduction to Algorithms. M.: Williams; 2013. 1328 р (In Russ). 9. Mylnikov L.A., Saltykova A.D., Avramovic Z. EventDriven Process Methodology Notation for Information Processing Research. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics. 2024; 58(4): 243–254. 10. Vogel-Heuser B., Lindemann U., Reinhart G. Innovationsprozesse zyklenorientiert managen. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014. 11. Erl T. Service-Oriented Architecture: Concepts, Technology, and Design. Prentice Hall; 2005. 760 р. 12. Linthicum D. Enterprise Application Integration. AddisonWesley Professional; 2000. 400 p. 13. Mylnikov L. Efficiency management of discrete production systems under the dynamics of project portfolio. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2021; 163: 07807. 14. Wynn M.T. Lebherz Ju., van der Aalst W., Accorsi R., DiCiccio C., Jayarathna L, Verbeek H. M. W. Rethinking the Input for Process Mining: Insights from the XES Survey and Workshop. 2022. 3–16 p. 15. Watson A.H., McCabe T.J. Structured Testing: A Testing Methodology Using the Cyclomatic Complexity Metric. Gaithersburg, USA: National Institute of Standards and Technology; 1996. 124 р. 16. Petrov, A. E. Tensor method of dual networks. M.: TZITiP Ltd; 2007. 496 р (In Russ). 17. Newman M.E.J. The Structure and Function of Complex Networks. SIAM Review. 2003; 45(2): 167–256. 18. Zhang X., Li J., Liu J., Zhang H., Liu L. Social Network Sensitive Area Perturbance Method Based on Firefly Algorithm. IEEE Access. 2019; 7: 137759–137769. 19. Tang P., Song Ch., Ding W., Ma Ju.,Dong Ju., Huang L. Research on the Node Importance of a Weighted Network Based on the K-Order Propagation Number Algorithm. Entropy. 2020; 22 (3): 364. 20. Dijkstra E.W. A note on two problems in connexion with graphs. Numerische Mathematik.1959; 1(1): 269–271. 21. Tiwari U., Kumar S. Cyclomatic complexity metric for component based software. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 2014; 39(1): 1–6. 22. Trivedi K.S. Probability and Statistics with Reliability, Queueing, and Computer Science Applications. Wiley; 2016. 880 р. 23. Sharifghazvini M., Ghezavati R., Raissi S., Makui A. Integration of a new MCDM approach based on the DEA, FANP with MONLP for efficiency-risk assessment to optimize project portfolio by branch and bound: a real case study. Economic computation and economic cybernetics studies and research. 2018; 52(1): 261–278. 24. Mylnikov L.A., Mylnikova S.L., Avramovic Z.Z. Structural-Functional Models for Effective Topologies Search. Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics. 2025; 59 (2): 71–77. 25. Amberg M., Bodendorf F., Möslein K.M. Wertschöpfungsorientierte Wirtschaftsinformatik. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. 164 р.
|
