|
Abstract.
The traditional approach to planning the production of science-intensive products is mainly focused on the use of design and technological documentation as a primary source, on the basis of which inventory and production capacity management occurs. However, at the early stages of the product life cycle, a significant amount of additional documentation is generated, which is not taken into account in existing planning systems. This article proposes a method for optimizing the information process of product life cycle support based on a robust mathematical model. The study analyzes the interaction of key life cycle support systems in order to identify bottlenecks in information exchange processes. The developed model allows taking into account all types of documents at the stages preceding the release of working design documentation. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is assessed based on an analysis of the costs of manufactured products and their comparison with traditional planning methods.
Keywords:
manufacturing planning, product life cycle, robust optimization, document management system, SciCMS, PDM, ERP, information support, unified information space, documentation tree.
DOI 10.14357/20718632260109
EDN ANAULM
PP. 100-112.
References
1. Dorosinskiy L.G., Zvereva O.M. Information technologies for product life cycle support. Ulyanovsk: Zebra Publishing; 2016. 243 p. (in Russ.). 2. Kultenko V.P., Buchkova Z.A. Application of CALS technologies in shipbuilding in the creation of the Russian scientific fleet. Issues of sustainable development of society. 2022; (4): 1197–1204 (in Russ.). 3. Sazonov A.A., Dzhamay V.V., Povekvechnykh S.A. Analysis of efficiency of implementation of CALS technologies on the example of domestic aviation. 2018; 26(1): 84–92 (in Russ.). 4. Afraymovich L.G., Vlasov V.S., Kulikov M.S., Prilutskiy M.H., Starostin N.V., Filimonov A.V. Planning and operational management of the manufacturing process of complex products. XII All-Russian Conference on Management Problems of the VSPU-2014. V.A. Trapeznikov Institute of Control Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences; 2014; 5138–5149 (in Russ.). 5. Ben-Tal A., Ghaoui L.E., Nemirovski A. Robust Optimization. Princeton University Press; 2009. 576 p. 6. Goryashko A.P., Nikulchev E.V. Robust optimization as a new approach to solving problems with uncertainty. News of higher educational institutions. Problems of printing and publishing. 2011; (1): 77–86 (in Russ.). 7. Timofeeva G.A. Probabilistic solutions to constrained optimization problems. Proceedings of the Institute of Mathematics and Mechanics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 2020; 1(26): 198–211 (in Russ.). 8. Bertsimas D., Thiele A. A Robust Optimization Approach to Inventory Theory. Operations Research. 2006; 1(54); 150–168. 9. Yablochnikov E.I., Fomina Yu.N., Salomatina A.A. Computer technologies in the product life cycle. St. Petersburg; 2010. 188 p. (in Russ.). 10. Kuzin E.I., Kuzin V.E. Support of the complex engineering system productive life: analysis of the declarative and imperative approaches to virtual enterprise behaviour modeling. Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation. 2016; 5(53) (in Russ). 11. Vychugova A.A., Vichugov V.N., Dmitrieva E.A., Tsapko G.P., Tsapko S.G. Methodological foundations for designing complex science-intensive products and principles for constructing an integrated information environment based on CALS technologies. Tomsk: TPU; 2013. 180 p. (in Russ.). 12. Li Y., Roy U., Shin S., Lee Y. A “Smart Component” data model in PLM. IEEE International Conference on Big Data. Santa Clara; 2015. 13. Karyachkin Ya.G., Dudanov E.I., Rezvova O.D., Sazonova Yu.S. PDM- and PLM-systems. Similarities and differences between systems. XLVIII Ogarev Readings. Proceedings of the scientific conference. National Research Mordovian State University named after N.P. Ogarev. 2020; pp. 580–584 (in Russ.). 14. Lesin I.A., Divntnko A.A. Product life cycle management in mechanical engineering enterprises. Information technologies in science and education. Problems and prospects. Penza; 2021: 369–371 (in Russ.). 15. Filippov P.V., Shumayev M.Yu., Marchenko A.V. Application of information technologies for managing the life cycle of vessels and marine facilities. Transport of the Russian Federation. 2016; 1(62): 32–35 (in Russ.). 16. Vilkov Yu.V., Kartamyshev A.S., Poturemskiy I.V., Popov A.M. End-to-end work planning system as the basis of information control system integration at the aerospace enterprises. High technology. 2016; 7(17): 52–55 (in Russ.). 17. Chernysh B.A., Kartamyshev A.S., Poturemskiy I.V., Haydukova V.N. Organization of cross-cutting support of customized production of scientific products. Dynamics of Complex Systems - 21st Century. 2020; 4(14): 46–54 (in Russ.). 18. Shabanov, E.E., Fakhrislamov I.I., Chekulaev P. N. Optimization of information processes in the enterprise: “ESB integration bus”, Information technologies in design and production, 2021; 1(181): 38–41 (in Russ.). 19. European Space Agency. Available from: https://www.esa.int/ [Accessed 25 April 2025]. 20. NASA Cost Estimating Handbook (CEH) – NASA. Availablefrom: https://www.nasa.gov/ocfo/ppc-corner/nasa-costestimating-handbook-ceh/ [Accessed 25 April 2025]. 21. Govoruha A.Yu., Evdokimova S.A., Novikova T.P. Analysis of the application of the PERT method for project planning and management. Prospective aspects of modeling systems and processes. Proceedings of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference. Voronezh; 2023. pp. 282–289 (in Russ.). 22. Chernysh B.A., Murygin A.V. A GraphQL dynamic schema in integrated information system implementation. Software & Systems. 2022; (4): 644–653 (in Russ.).
|
